Holloman v. Holloman.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ActioN by Kindred Holloman'v. Sarah A. D. Hollo-man, beard by Judge A. L. Goble, at Spring Term, 1900, of SeRTKokd Superior Court. Erom judgment for plaintiff, tbe defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Tbis action was commenced under sec: 1286 of Tbe Code for a divorce a mensa et ihoro. It was begun after tbe passage of tbe act (cbap. 27Y, Laws. 1895,) wbicb provided for divorces a vinculo in cases of abandonment for two years, but before tbe expiration of two years from the time of the abandonment of tbe plaintiff by tbe defendant, bis wife. After tbe enactment of cbap. 211 of tbe Laws of 1899, wbicb amended tbe act of 1895 by substituting one year’s abandonment for tbe two prescribed by tbe act of 1895 as tbe cause of divorce a vineulo, tbe plaintiff amended bis complaint so as to allege…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dearmond v. DearmondCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1892
- Booshee v. . SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
3Cited by14 opinions
- Martin v. Martin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Hinkle v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Wills v. WillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Woodruff v. . WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.