Legal Opinion
National Amusements, Inc. v. Borough of Palmyra
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 3, 2012No. Civil Action No. 08-2469 (JEI/KMW)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge:
This action initially arose due to Defendant Borough of Palmyra (“Palmyra”) issuing a resolution closing Plaintiff National Amusement, Inc.’s (“National”) flea market to the public. Palmyra now moves for summary judgment.
I
Some of the facts, and inferences drawn from those facts, are disputed. The Court resolves those discrepancies in favor of National.
During, and shortly after World War II, Palmyra owned National’s property. (See National’s Counter Statement of Facts ¶ 1). During that time, Palmyra authorized the United States Army to test munitions. (Id.)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas v. East Orange Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- OM 309-311 6TH STREET, LLC v. THE CITY OF UNION CITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- R.K. v. BENDERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- TADROS v. STACKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021