Legal Opinion

Graham v. Zellers

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The ruling denying the defendant Zellers the right to ask for a dismissal of a garnishment action was based on his failure to have interposed a pleading. It appears without dispute that the instrument on which the proceedings are based and out of which the indebtedness grew was a negotiable note. After the garnishee defendant had served and filed his answer showing liability to be based upon the promissory note, the plaintiff took issue with such answer, and under sec. 267.12, Stats., the issue stood for trial as a civil action, “in which the affidavit on the part of the plaintiff shall be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Disconto Gesellschaft v. UmbreitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Davis v. PawletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1854
  3. State v. Citizens' Insurance Co. of MobileWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Badger Lumber Co. v. SternWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Skalecki v. FrederickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API