Legal Opinion
United States of America, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee v. L.R. Bretz, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1993No. 91-35894Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
988 F.2d 122
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee
v.
L.R. BRETZ, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant.
No. 91-35894.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1992.
Decided March 12, 1993.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Village of Bellwood v. Chandra DwivediCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Brault v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Chandru Mirchandani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. California School of Professional PsychologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.