Legal Opinion
Chandru Mirchandani v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1988No. 86-4078PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
Mirchandani appeals from the denial of his petition for habeas corpus in an extradition proceeding. He raises issues that require an understanding of the nature of extradition proceedings as well as of this record.
This is the second time that the district court has denied appellant’s petition for habeas corpus after he was ordered extradited in January 1986. After the first denial, he noticed an appeal to this court. We ordered a limited remand to permit the district court to address the Government’s post-judgment motion to reopen the proceedings in order to consider…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fernandez v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Charlton v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- 35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 574, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,116 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Etc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and State of California Fair Employment and Housing Commission (Successor to State of California Fair Employment Practice Commission)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Robert Montgomery Hooker, Appellant-Petitioner v. Frank X. Klein, United States Marshal, N.D. Of California, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Sefadin Asani v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Doe v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Vincent CaterinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Zeferino Mendez-Gutierrez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Lucas Automotive Engineering, Inc. v. Bridgestone/firestone, Inc., and Coker Tire CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.