Legal Opinion
Reeser v. Henry Ford Health System
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 12, 2015No. Case No. 14-CV-11916PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 43)
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Natalie Reeser alleges retaliatory discharge in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 291 et seq., and Michigan’s Whistleblower’s Protection Act (“WPA”), M.C.L. § 15.362, for reporting defendant Henry Ford Health System’s (“HFHS”) failure to pay her for lunch breaks to the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (“LARA”). Defendant moves for summary judgment on the basis that plaintiff was terminated for closing the clinic where she…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chavez-Deremer v. Tosh Pork, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Su v. Tosh Pork, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024