Legal Opinion

Rogers v. De Soto Placer Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1905No. 1,103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, Circuit Judge

There is, we think, no doubt of the sufficiency of the verification in question. The only requirement of the bankruptcy act relative to verification of pleadings is found in section 18, subd. “c,” Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 551 (11 U.S.C.Á. § 41(c) : “All pleadings setting up matters of fact shall be verified under oath.” Here was a *349verification by the attorney of the petitioners, made because of their absence from the District of Alaska, and their consequent inability to verify it, and based upon his knowledge of the facts. We can conceive of no good reason why such a verification is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green River Deposit Bank v. CraigDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1901
  2. In re Chequasset Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1901
  3. In re SimonsonDistrict Court, D. Kentucky · 1899
  4. In re HerzikopfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1902
  5. In re HuntDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wetherbee v. Willow Lane, Inc. (In Re Bestway Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1993
  2. In re Pearl Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. In re SlatkinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
  4. Cook v. Du Pont Cellophane Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API