Legal Opinion

De Nike v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC., RETIREMENT SYS.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 27, 1960PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

62 N.J. Super. 280 (1960)

162 A.2d 891

MATTIE DE NIKE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 15, 1959.

Reargued May 24, 1960.

Decided June 27, 1960.

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and FOLEY.

Mr. Franklin W. Kielb argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Lee A. Holley, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

Plaintif…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mazza v. CavicchiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Ward v. KeenanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Taylor v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Schack v. TrimbleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Duke Power Co. v. PattenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pfleger v. NJ State Highway Dept.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Cohen v. UMDNJ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  3. Marranca v. HarboNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Moss v. ShinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. STATE BOARD OF MED. EXAM'RS v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API