Legal Opinion

Danstrup v. Hobson

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 18, 1954No. 19740Published

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

This is a libel in admiralty for maintenance and cure. Following the trial of the action I rendered an opinion, dated May 28, 1953, concluding that the libel should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, because of the absence of proof that libellant had complied with the statutory requirement of filing a notice of claim with the proper governmental agency before bringing an action. Danstrup v. Richmond P. Hobson & United States, D.C., 112 F.Supp. 851. Subsequently, upon an application by the libellant I granted an order, dated July 2, 1953, reopening the trial, “so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Danstrup v. HobsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API