Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Conway
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 21, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered for the defendant dismissing the writ of habeas corpus “after a full hearing on all the evidence.” In his application for a writ of habeas corpus, the plaintiff alleged that Ms confinement, pursuant to our governor’s warrant, issued under General Statutes § 54-163, authorizing rendition to the executive authority of the state of Colorado, was invalid because he was not a fugitive, and that the action by the Governor of Connecticut was improper under § 54-159 because Colorado “has failed to produce sufficient evidence that the applicant has fled…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Munsey v. CloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Appleyard v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- South Carolina v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barrila v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Glavin v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Parks v. BourbeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Wentworth v. BourbeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Thomlinson v. LiburdiConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.