Legal Opinion
Barrila v. Blake
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 12, 1983No. 10894PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of the petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a fugitive extradition warrant under which the petitioner is being held for rendition to the authorities of the state of Indiana. The petitioner, Robert Barrila, claims that he is not a fugitive from justice in Indiana, and that consequently his custody in the hands of the defendant, Richard E. Blake, a Con necticut state trooper, is illegal. The trial court, after an evidentiary hearing, rendered a judgment for the defendant from which the petitioner has appealed.
The procedural…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Appleyard v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- South Carolina v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Illinois Ex Rel. McNichols v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. FalconSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.