Legal Opinion
Wiechens v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 16, 2002No. 2:00-cv-01858PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McNAMEE, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. # 20) and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 22). After considering the arguments raised by the parties in their briefing and in oral argument, the Court now issues the following ruling.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Donald Wiechens, a single man, and Plaintiffs Gary and Deborah Wie-chens, husband and wife (“Plaintiffs”), are partners in the Wiechens Properties Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership (the “Partnership”). (Compl. at ¶ 1.) The Partnership owns land…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peabody Natural Res. Co. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
- Peabody Natural Res. Co. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
- Peabody Natural Resources Company, f.k.a. Hanson Natural Resources Company, Cavenham Forest Industries, Inc., A Partner Other Than The Tax Matters Partner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2006