Legal Opinion

People v. Sinegal

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 5, 2011No. 5-09-0563PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE CHAPMAN

delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.

Justices Welch and Donovan concurred in the judgment and opinipn.

OPINION

The defendant, Cedric J. Sinegal, appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of cannabis. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash arrest and suppress evidence because officers who pierced the side of a plastic-wrapped package containing the cannabis lacked probable cause to search the package. We affirm.

The defendant’s conviction stems from a stop of his vehicle at a gas station near Interstate 57 in Union County,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. McDonoughIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. United States v. Ricardo WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  2. People v. MolnarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  3. People v. RandallAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
  4. People v. MallettAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  5. People v. MolnarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API