Legal Opinion
In re Jackson
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Motions to vacate and set aside orders of reference granted ex parte.
1Opinion of the CourtHendrick, J.
These are motions to vacate and set aside orders of reference, granted ex parte in these proceedings, in pursuance of an application by the Attorney-General, under chapter 690 of the Laws of 1899, sometimes called the Donnelly Anti-Trust Act. The petition of the Attorney-General, - upon which the orders were granted, sets forth that the petitioner, as such Attorney-General, intends to begin an action, under chapter 690 of the L-aws of 1899, in behalf of the People of the State of Hew York against the “ Postal Telegraph and Cable Company ” and the “ Western Union Telegraph Company,” domestic…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Matter of DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Attorney-General v. Consolidated Gas Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907
- Benedict v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amory H. Bradford v. The New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Golden State Linen Service, Inc. v. VidalinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. EpsteanNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1918
- People v. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- S-P Drug Co. v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1978