Legal Opinion

State of Ohio v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 24, 2020No. 20-288Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-288C (Filed: September 24, 2020) ) STATE OF OHIO, et al., ) Dispute over charges payable for ) operation and maintenance under a Plaintiffs, ) contract entered pursuant to the Water ) Supply Act of 1958; timeliness; v. ) applicability of the continuing claim ) doctrine UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Ian F. Gaunt, Assistant Attorney General, State of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs. With him on the briefs were Dave Yost, Attorney General, and Daniel J. Martin and Amber Wootten Hertlein, Assistant Attorneys General, State of Ohio,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API