Legal Opinion
United States v. Haren
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1991No. Nos. 91-1282, 91-1371, 91-1373 and 91-1880PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
After a joint trial a jury convicted the four appellants of drug offenses arising out of an amphetamine manufacturing and distribution operation. Richard Harén was convicted of manufacturing amphetamine and conspiring to distribute amphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1988) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1988). Vickie Harén and Sebastian Alaniz were convicted of conspiring to distribute amphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1988). Doyle Hughes was convicted of aiding and abetting in the manufacture of amphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Antonio Nonato EvidenteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ernest R. Streeter, United States of America v. Robert Jay CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Dale Lynn RyanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. MuhlenbruchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. John Corcoran WickerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.