Legal Opinion

MacDonald & Co. v. Differential Steel Car Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 2, 1948No. Civ. No. 5811PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KLOEB, District Judge.

Application has been filed in this case by Hector MacDonald, Thomas Lonsdale and Guillermo Morris for an order directing that the applicants, partners doing business under the firm name of MacDonald & Company, be substituted as parties plaintiff for MacDonald & Company, that they be permitted to become parties plaintiff herein in their own names, and that the order of the Court direct that the applicants shall be considered as adopting the allegations of the complaint and the more definite statement filed by MacDonald & Company, and that the action proceed upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. United States v. KoikeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  3. Tibbs v. ParrottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1804

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fomby v. WhisenhuntAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API