Legal Opinion
Fomby v. Whisenhunt
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1984No. 7434PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The question in this case is whether a plaintiff's claim for contract damages is barred pursuant to AS 08.18.151 1 due to the claimant’s alleged failure to comply with AS 08.18.011. 2 We conclude that summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant.
The lawsuit was filed on December 18, 1981, in the name of Dale Fomby, d/b/a Nova Excavating & Paving, seeking payment for excavating services performed for Robert D. Whisenhunt. The complaint did not allege status as a registered contractor. Whisenhunt answered on January 15, 1982, and asserted as an affirmative defense, that the…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Northern Lights Motel, Inc. v. SweaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Murphy v. KeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Braun v. Alaska Commercial Fishing & Agriculture BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Alaska Protection Services, Inc. v. Frontier Colorcable, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Hikita v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Southeast Alaska Construction Co. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Petranovich v. Matanuska Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.