Legal Opinion

Falcon v. Memorial Hospital

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1990No. Docket Nos. 86721, 86722, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

(to affirm). The deposition testimony of *447plaintiff Ruby Falcon’s1 expert witness tended to show that had the defendant physician, S. N. Kelso, Jr., followed the procedures the expert witness claims should have been followed, the patient, Nena J. Falcon, would have had a 37.5 percent opportunity2 of surviving the medical accident that was a cause of her death.

The trial court dismissed the complaint3 because Falcon’s evidence did not show that Nena Falcon probably—defined as more than fifty percent— would have survived if the procedure had not been omitted. The Court of Appeals reversed,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Jones v. Montefiore HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Evers v. DollingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Lewisville Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kilpatrick v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wollen v. DePaul Health CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API