Legal Opinion

Rio Grande Motor Way, Inc. v. Public Service Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1968No. Nos. 11221-11223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

In this proceeding the plaintiffs challenge the right of the Public Service Commission to issue authority on a temporary basis to the defendant common motor carriers. Insofar as is material here, each of the three defendants is rendering what can be called a specialized carrier service. Their certificates are generally similar, but contain some variations in wording, not material to the principal issue here. They are authorized to make hauls throughout the State of an unusual or irregular character which, by reason of “size, shape, weight, origin or destination require…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Attorney General of Utah v. PomeroyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. W. S. Hatch Co. v. Public Service Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Ashworth Transfer Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Salt Lake Transfer Co. v. Barton Truck Line, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monson v. CarverUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cullum v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Cullum v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Monson v. CarverUtah Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API