RUNDLE v. Delaware and Raritan Canal Company
Supreme Court of the United States
. This case was brought up; by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States 'for the- District of. New Jersey. The facts in the case are set forth in the opinion of the court..
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gejeb
The plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs below, are owners *88of certain mills in Pennsylvania, ppposite to the city of Trenton, in New Jersey.' These mills are 'supplied with water from the Delaware River, by means of a dam extending from the Pennsylvania shore to an island lying near and parallel to it, and extending along the rapids to the head of tide water.
The plaintiffs, in their declaration, show title to the property under one-Adam Hoops, who had erected his mill and built a dam in the river previous to the year 1771. In that year, the Provinces of Pennsylvania and New Jersey,…
2Cited by36 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- St. Anthony Falls Water Power Company v. St. Paul Water Commissioners; Minneapolis Mill Company v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.