Legal Opinion

St. Anthony Falls Water Power Company v. St. Paul Water Commissioners; Minneapolis Mill Company v. Same

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 29, 1897No. Nos. 23 and 24PublishedCited by 88 opinions

These actions were brought in a District Court of the State of Minnesota, by the respective plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error for the purpose of recovering damages for injury to their alleged rights as riparian owners and otherwise, at St. Anthony Palls on the Mississippi River, and also for á perpetual injunction enjoining the defendant in error from diverting the waters above so as to prevent them from flowing in their natural course in the.

Read the full summary

These actions were brought in a District Court of the State of Minnesota, by the respective plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error for the purpose of recovering damages for injury to their alleged rights as riparian owners and otherwise, at St. Anthony Palls on the Mississippi River, and also for á perpetual injunction enjoining the defendant in error from diverting the waters above so as to prevent them from flowing in their natural course in the. Mississippi Eiver and down to the water power of the plaintiffs in error respectively. The plaintiff in error, the St. Anthony Falls…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peckham

It is claimed upon the part of the plaintiffs in error that by the decision of the court below they have been deprived of their property without due procéss of law. They urge that they have certain rights as riparian owners5 of land near St. Anthony Falls, bordering upon the Mississippi River, to the use of all the water as it would naturally flow past their land, and that this right is property that its existence and extent are to be determined by the general law applicable to riparian owners in like situation, which right is not determined con- • clusively by a state court, and that being…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API