Cecil v. Gallo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Respondent brings this cause before us by way of motion to dismiss the appeal taken by appellants from an order striking out certain portions of defendants’ answer to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. The clerk’s *146transcript does not disclose that a final judgment has been entered.
On previous occasions this court has had before it similar questions. See Jordan v. Associated Discount Corp., 10 Cal.App.2d 96 [51 P.2d 1108], and Couch v. McGregor, 19 Cal.App.2d 633 [66 P.2d 159]. We find nothing in the present case to take it out of the well established rule that no appeal lies from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Couch v. McGregorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Jordan v. Associated Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Tedford v. San Diego Electric Ry. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Potter v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955