Legal Opinion

Ore Navigation Corporation v. Thomsen

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1958No. 7683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

256 F.2d 447

ORE NAVIGATION CORPORATION, Petitioner,

v.

Honorable Roszel C. THOMSEN, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Maryland, and the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Respondents.

No. 7683.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 3, 1958.

Decided June 5, 1958.

George W. P. Whip, Baltimore, Md. (Lord, Whip & Coughlan, Baltimore, Md., on petition), for petitioner.

Solomon Kaplan, Baltimore, Md. (Sol C. Berenholtz, Baltimore, Md., on memorandum), for Eugene Jackson in opposition to petition.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, SOPER,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Clinton Foods, Inc. v. United States. Clinton Foods, Inc. v. Moore, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  3. Emerick Et Ux. v. Lambert, Adm'xCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  4. Ore Navigation Corp. v. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  5. Highway Engineering & Construction Co. v. Hillsborough CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edward J. Miskiewicz, T/a Maryland Marina, George P. Kopack, George Matthews and Lee O. Akers v. Ronald H. Goodman, of Yacht Md 1539 BbCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API