Legal Opinion

Fobes v. School District

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1859PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL PROM CIRCUIT COURT, JEFFERSON COUNTY. The facts of this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Cole, J.

We do not entertain a doubt hut that a director of a school district can recover of such district *118the amount of any necessary expenses which he may have been put to, or incurred, in the prosecution or defense of a suit, brought by or against the district of which he is an officer. The law expressly requires that he shall appear for and on behalf of the district in all suits brought by or against the district, when no other direction shall be given by the qualified voters of such district, at a district meeting. Section 18, chap. 80, Ses. Laws, 1854; same provision in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maynard v. TidballWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel v. Wisconsin Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority v. EarlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Carpenter v. Yeadon BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API