Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Durbin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 11, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Lee Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Couet by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

The appellee, William Durbin, sued the appellant railroad company to recover damages caused by injury *364to his crops sustained by the failure, as he alleged, of the railroad company to maintain in proper condition á cattle guard. On the trial of the case there- was. a judgment for Durbin, and on this . appeal, the only ground relied on for reversal- that we need consider is the correctness of the ruling of the trial judge in refusing to order a directed verdict for the railroad eompany.

It appears from the evidence that the land of Durbin is situated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parrish v. Louisville & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. McKee v. C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Company's ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  3. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DurbinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Johnson v. STATE, HWY. DIV. OF DEPT. OF TRANSPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Johnson v. State ex rel. Highway DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API