Legal Opinion
Luckett v. Jennings
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 17, 1993No. Record 921731PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan
In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred in sustaining demurrers on the ground that the amended motion for judgment fails to allege a conspiracy to injure the plaintiff’s business in violation of Code §§ 18.2-499 to -500.
Robert D. Luckett filed an amended motion for judgment against William J. Jennings, James R. Jennings, William B. Jennings (collectively, Jennings) and Robert A. McGinnis, Jennings’s attorney. Luckett alleges, among other things, that he
is in the business of real estate development. He engages in residential and commercial development in Maryland and Virginia…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowman v. State Bank of KeysvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- CaterCorp, Inc. v. Catering Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1993
- Buschi v. KirvenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Cox Cable Hampton Roads, Inc. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Allen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- W. S. Carnes, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Riverview Farm Associates Virginia General Partnership v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Majorana v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Labovitz, Peter C. v. WA Times CorpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- McDermott v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.