Legal Opinion

McDermott v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 9, 2000No. Record 992028PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this appeal, we consider whether Code § 8.01-220 bars a plaintiff’s action against his former wife’s paramour for intentional infliction of emotional distress, when the conduct alleged would support an action for alienation of affection, a cause of action specifically prohibited by the statute.

Glenn R. McDermott filed a motion for judgment against William Reynolds for intentional infliction of emotional distress based on Reynolds’ alleged conduct in maintaining an adulterous relationship with McDermott’s wife. Reynolds demurred to the motion for judg ment, asserting that McDermott’s action…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Womack v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  2. Russo v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  3. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Mortarino v. Consultant Engineering Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  5. Philip Morris, Inc. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Almy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  2. Woods v. MendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  3. Martin v. ZiherlSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Bouchard v. SundbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Blake Construction Co. v. Upper Occoquan Sewage AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API