Legal Opinion
Bakambia v. Schnell
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 22, 2021No. 0:20-cv-01433Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Marc Amouri Bakambia, Case No. 0:20-cv-1433 (PAM/KMM) Plaintiff, ORDER v. Paul Schnell et al., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on several motions and requests filed by Mr. Bakambia. Specifically, Mr. Bakambia has filed three motions to compel, which the Court refers to as his First, Second, and Third Motions to Compel. [ECF Nos. 69, 84, 123]. Mr. Bakambia has also filed a Motion for a “Written Explanation” [ECF No. 84]; a Motion for sanctions against opposing counsel [ECF No. 100]; and a motion for reconsideration of his prior…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Lora Stuart v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Patrice Bradford v. Dana Corporation, Sealed Power DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Jeffrey C. Rahn v. Vickie Hawkins Craig Jansen Gerald FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.