Legal Opinion

Peck v. Clesi

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 4, 1963No. Civ. A. No. C 62-889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.

Plaintiff has sued to recover for injuries and damages allegedly resulting from an automobile accident in which the defendants were involved. The plaintiff submitted twenty-four requests for admissions pursuant to Rule 36, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendants admitted three of the requests, and have filed objections to the remainder.

In regard to the proper use of Rule 36, Professor Moore has said: “As pointed out earlier, the procedure for obtaining admissions of fact should be used to obtain admission of facts as to which there is no real dispute and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Hotels Ass'n v. Urban Redevelopment AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Electric Furnace Co. v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
  3. Lantz v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trabon Engineering Co. v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
  2. Rosado v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
  3. City of Miami v. BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. Wedding v. Tallant Transfer Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1963
  5. Rosado v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API