Legal Opinion

Schuh v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 3, 1941No. 43909Published

1Opinion of the Court

*147Opinion

2Per curiam

This is a suit of a Coast Artillery Reserve Officer, United States Army, for rental and subsistence allowances authorized for an officer of his rank with a dependent while assigned to active duty from June 24,1935, to August 6, 1937.

During the period of this claim, the plaintiff was a second lieutenant, Coast Artillery Reserve, to July 10, 1936, and was a first lieutenant from that date. The findings show that during this period his mother was dependent upon him for her chief support and did not occupy Government quarters. At the time involved, the plaintiff was stationed at Yaphank…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Francis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  2. Byrne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  3. Beery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  4. Hartsel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API