Legal Opinion

Hartsel v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 12, 1940No. 42786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Chief Justice

Plaintiff, a commissioned officer on active duty in the United States Marine Corps with the rank of First Lieutenant, sues for the rental allowance of an officer of his rank and grade without dependents for the period from August 1,1928, to June 2, 1929, while assigned to duty with *130the United States Marine Corps in China. Plaintiff bases his claim upon Section 6 of the Act of June 10, 1922, as amended by section 2 of the Act of May 31, 1924 (43 Stat. 250, 251).

From August 1, 1928, to August 20, 1928, while stationed at Tientsin plaintiff occupied jointly with other officers an unheated and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Francis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  2. Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  3. Markley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lake v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  2. Cornell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  3. Holcomb v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  4. Schuh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API