Legal Opinion

Zink v. Khwaja

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 17, 2000No. 99-0149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.

¶ 1. Louis Zink appeals a judgment dismissing his nuisance claim against Akhtar Khwaja and Berlin Cranberry Ltd. Zink contends that the circuit court erred when it determined that: (1) Zink failed to prove that Khwaja's cranberry operation had caused damage to his property; (2) Khwaja's actions in operating his cranberry farm were not unreasonable; and (3) Khwaja had acquired a prescriptive right to operate his cranberry farm in the manner in which it had been historically operated. We conclude that the circuit court did not clearly err in finding that Zink failed to prove that Khwaja's…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Jungbluth v. Hometown, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Anderson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. La Crosse Lutheran Hospital v. La Crosse CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  5. Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Madison Metropolitan School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Borowski v. Weinhold (Weinhold)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
  2. Pauline Buchholz, as Trustee of the Trust Agreement v. Steven K. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API