Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 22, 1993No. 92-1558PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This interlocutory appeal stems from a dispute over a treating physician’s fee for deposition testimony. At issue is the enforcement of a protective order compelling the payment of a $500 per hour fee. Because we believe the protective order cannot be justified under this record, we reverse and remand.

Plaintiff Larry Pierce sued defendants, Clyde and Janice Nelson, for personal inju ries he sustained in an automobile collision. 1 During discovery, the defendants sought to depose Dr. Rodney Johnson, an orthopedic surgeon who had treated Pierce for his injuries. Dr. Johnson…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coker v. Abell-Howe Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. Rowen v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Jochims v. Isuzu Motors, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992
  4. Paige v. City of CharitonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. Verschoor v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carolan v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Gabelmann v. NFO, INC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Hose v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1994
  4. Fisher v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  5. In Re the Marriage of BolickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API