Legal Opinion
City of Kalamazoo v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 11, 1995No. Docket 167172PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff sued defendant, claiming that defendant’s action in locating a community corrections facility within Kalamazoo was contrary to § 1005 of 1992 PA 163, the general appropriations bill for the Department of Corrections for 1993. * 1 The trial court concluded that § 1005 was unconstitutional and entered an order dismissing plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff appeals as of right. We reverse.
The trial court held that § 1005 violated the Title-Object Clause of the Michigan Constitution. 2 Const 1963, art 4, § 24 states in part that "[n]o law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1975 PA 227Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Dearden v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Mooahesh v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Valentine v. Redford Township SupervisorMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Kalamazoo v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Addison Township v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997