Legal Opinion
Schumacher v. AK Steel Corp. Ret. Acc. Pension Plan
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 4, 2014No. Case No. 1:09-cv-794PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for an award of attorney’s fees. (Doc. 184) Defendants have responded to the motion (Doc. 190), and Plaintiffs have filed their reply brief. (Doc. 199)
The facts of this case are well known to the parties and the Court, and they will be discussed as needed in conjunction with the issues raised in the fee motions.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiffs’ motion asks the Court to award fees of $1,326,000, an amount which is equivalent to 30% of the $4.42 million judgment entered in this case. Plaintiffs argue that AK Steel should…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Northcross v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stenberg v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Stenberg v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ball v. KasichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Canter v. Alkermes Blue Care Elect Preferred Provider PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Doe v. State of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.