Legal Opinion
Pinzl v. Lapointe
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 2, 1983No. 82-658PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
426 So.2d 65 (1983)
David PINZL and Diana Pinzl, Appellants,
v.
Donald LAPOINTE and Deliah Lapointe, Appellees.
No. 82-658.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
February 2, 1983.
Edward A. Broyles, Forest City, for appellants.
Mark O. Cooper of Bornstein, Petree, Brooks, Cooper & Marks, Orlando, for appellees.
SHARP, Judge.
We reverse this judgment which dismissed appellants' amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action in fraud or misrepresentation. The lower court ruled that, because the complaint alleged the appellants knew of a discrepancy between the accountant's…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sencer v. Carl's MarketSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Butts v. DragstremDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Gonzalez v. PataneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Warner v. Harris Miami Beach, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Cath-Art Products Co. v. BornmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thor Bear, Inc. v. Crocker Mizner ParkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Young v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WeissDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- S & S Air Conditioning Co. v. FreireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Dynamic Cablevision of Florida Inc. v. Palmetto 114 AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990