Legal Opinion

Moore v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1986No. 83-1459PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the armed robbery of McLoyd Cotten, D.C.Code § 22-2901 (1981), and of assaulting Collier Rowe with the intent to rob Cotten, D.C.Code § 22-501 (1981). Appellant raises two issues on appeal. First, appellant contends that the second count of the indictment, charging him with the assault of Rowe with the intent to rob Cotten was fatally defective. 1 Second, appellant contends that the trial judge committed error by failing to impose a sanction against the government for its failure to comply with the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (1981). We affirm…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Battle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Browner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API