Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1995No. 93-CF-478PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

A jury found appellant guilty of, among other things, three counts of assault with intent to murder (AWIM) while armed, D.C.Code §§ 22-503, -2403, -3202(a)(1) (1989).1 His principal argument on appeal is that, as to two of these convictions, the trial judge committed plain error by instructing the jury on the theory of transferred intent. We affirm.

I

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the government, revealed that appellant fired five or six shots from a handgun at Jermaine Acklin from ten to twenty feet away. The shots struck both Acklin and Leslie…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. O'CONNOR v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State v. EarpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Hunt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Heard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Dockery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Fernandez v. DufrainDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API