Legal Opinion

Kurak v. Control Data Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1987No. C7-86-2079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying the appellant’s motion to vacate an order which dismissed his action under Minn.R.Civ.P. 41.02 and Rule 4.03 of the Rules of the Fourth Judicial District. We reverse.

FACTS

Appellant Raymond Kurak initiated an age and reverse race discrimination suit against his former employer, respondent Control Data Corporation. Kurak served his summons and complaint but did not file the documents with the district court. When Control Data filed its answers with the Hennepin County District Court on April 8, 1981, a court file number was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duenow v. LindemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Kosloski v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Sand v. School Service Employees Union, Local 284Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Copeland v. BraggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Gunderson v. Lake County Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charson v. Temple IsraelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. McKay v. Boyer Ford Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Shannon Fogarty v. Ciao BellaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API