Legal Opinion

Bridgeforth v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1956No. 12715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants were convicted of the offense of violating Title 26 U.S.C.A. § 3294(a), providing for failure to pay the tax required of persons engaged in receiving wagers. Neither intent to evade nor willfulness are required as proof of guilt of such offense. Appellants were sentenced to confinement and to payment of a fine for violation of the above named section of the statute. They concede they were legally convicted and sentenced under the count of the information charging violation of this section.

Appellants, however, were also indicted, tried, and convicted for violation of other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. KahrigerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward J. MesheskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. MesheskiDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1959
  3. William Sousa Bridgeforth v. United States of America, Robert W. Abernathy v. United States of America, William Thomas Woodson v. United States of America, William Sousa Bridgeforth, William Thomas Woodson, and Robert W. Abernathy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API