Legal Opinion
William Sousa Bridgeforth v. United States of America, Robert W. Abernathy v. United States of America, William Thomas Woodson v. United States of America, William Sousa Bridgeforth, William Thomas Woodson, and Robert W. Abernathy v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 15, 1956No. 12715_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
233 F.2d 451
William Sousa BRIDGEFORTH, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Robert W. ABERNATHY, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
William Thomas WOODSON, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
William Sousa BRIDGEFORTH, William Thomas Woodson, and Robert W. Abernathy, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 12715.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
May 15, 1956.
Ward Hudgins, Nashville, Tenn. (Harris Gilbert, Nashville, Tenn., on the brief), for appellants.
Fred Elledge, Jr., Nashville, Tenn., for appellee.
Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. KahrigerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Bridgeforth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956