Legal Opinion

City of Hobart v. State Ex Rel. Roper

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1926No. 24,691PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, J.

This was an action of mandamus against the appellant city of Hobart and its mayor and members of the common council to compel 'action upon a petition by appellee’s relators for the disannexation from the city of certain lands which they claim to own. Overruling the demurrer to the complaint and overruling the motion for a new trial are assigned as errors. The complaint alleged, in substance, that the defendant city of Hobart is a municipal corporation, that the defendant Henderson is mayor, and each of the other defendants is a councilman of said city. That the plaintiffs are the owners of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taggart v. KeeblerIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Dayton Gravel Road Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hammann v. MinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. BerdonIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tippecanoe County Area Plan Commission v. Sheffield Developers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Schwartzkopf v. State Ex Rel. FettigIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Botkin v. Delaware Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Co. of Iowa v. GorsuchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API