Legal Opinion

David Arnett v. Julia Arnett

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 2013No. 32A01-1208-DR-383Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, Apr 16 2013, 8:28 am collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DAVID W. STONE, IV Anderson, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA DAVID ARNETT, ) ) Appellant-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. 32A01-1208-DR-383 ) JULIA ARNETT, ) ) Appellee-Petitioner. ) APPEAL FROM THE HENDRICKS SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable Karen M. Love, Judge Cause No. 32D03-1011-DR-231 April 16, 2013 MEMORANDUM…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tri-Professional Realty, Inc. v. HillenburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Annette (Oliver) Hirsch v. Roger Lee OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Houchens v. BoschertIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API