Legal Opinion

Boyet v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1984No. 47385PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm.

Movant’s conviction for rape was affirmed in State v. Boyet, 620 S.W.2d 439 (Mo.App.1981). He then sought to vacate the conviction by alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and the discovery of new evidence. He now complains about the denial of an evidentiary hearing.

Movant alleges his trial attorney was ineffective for refusing to object “to hearsay testimony of allege telephone conversation; counsel refused to call witness for defendant.” Nothing further is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tollison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. BoyetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boggs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. McDonald v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Battle v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Frazier v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Mannon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API