Legal Opinion

Hemmings v. Home Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vermilion, J. —

-The claim of the plaintiff and appellee is to recover upon a policy of insurance issued by the appellant company, for the loss by fire of 12 head-of cattle and 18 tons of hay.

The issuance of the policy and the fact of the loss were admitted. The defense is based upon the claim that, at the time 'the policy was issued, the property insured was mortgaged, which fact was concealed by the appellee, and after the issuance of the policy, the próperty was further incumbered by a mortgage, without the consent of the company, all in violation of the terms of the policy. These defenses…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Watrous v. WatrousSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Corson v. Anchor Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Davis v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Currie v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. McDonald v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Briney v. Tri-State Mutual Grain Dealers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Scheetz v. IMT Ins. Co.(Mut.)Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Smith v. CoutantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. United States v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Association of Kiron, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API