Legal Opinion

(PC) Linder v. Pucelik

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 4, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02281Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUANE LINDER, No. 2:18-CV-2281-JAM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JALAL SOLTENIAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are: (1) motion to dismiss by defendants Galang and 19 Pucelik (ECF No. 19); and (2) unopposed motion for summary judgment by Smith and Soltenian 20 (ECF No. 24). 21 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 A. Plaintiff’s Allegations 24 This action…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API