Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, Case No.: 3:19-cv-2098-L-DEB 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 12 CITY OF CARLSBAD, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. 16 (ECFs 116, 158, 159, and 162). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted 17 without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1. For the reasons stated below, the Court 18 DENIES Plaintiff’s motion, and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART 19 Defendants’ motion. 20 I.…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.