Legal Opinion
Pincus v. U.S. Dyeing and Cleaning Works
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided April 20, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an application by a receiver to set aside a chattel mortgage made by the insolvent corporation, dated and delivered February 19th, 1925, and recorded March 6th, 1925.
The first point of attack is that the statutory affidavit annexed to the mortgage is not made by the mortgagee, his agent or attorney, within the meaning of the Chattel Mortgage act of this state.
The affidavit reads as follows:
"State of Missouri, | City of St. Louis. |
Ideal Filter Co., the mortgagee in the foregoing mortgage named, being duly sworn on oath, say that the true consideration of said mortgage is as follows,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lessler v. Paterson National BankNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Stanber v. Sims Magneto Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Watson v. RowleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
- Partridge v. Mechanics National BankNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
- Hopper v. LovejoyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Business Finance Co. v. WeitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Moore v. Preiss Trading Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- In re HarrisonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- Mitschele-Baer v. Livingston SandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Emmerglick v. Philip Wolf, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.