Legal Opinion

Watson v. Rowley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 10, 1902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On motion to dismiss bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, V. C.

The bill is filed to foreclose a chattel mortgage and if necessary to reform the same. The defendant, who, on this motion objects to the sufficiency of the bill as against him, is the general assignee of the mortgagors for the benefit of their creditors. His insistment is that the mortgage is shown by the bill to be void as against him because of the insufficiency of the affidavit accompanying the same.

The claim of the complainants that, in case the affidavit should be adjudged to be defective by reason of its failure to comply with the requirements of the statute, the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zucker v. SilversteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Business Finance Co. v. WeitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  3. Pincus v. U.S. Dyeing and Cleaning WorksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Moore v. Preiss Trading Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  5. In Re Gen. Assignment for Benefit of Creditors of National Meat Supply Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API